Free Definition Essay - The Meaning of Courage :: Expository Definition Essays

The Meaning of Courage In life there atomic number 18 many terms that atomic number 18 relative to individual cultures. That means that the definition is different depending on the cultures location and its mortals believe. The definition for unmatchable such term, courage, as defined by both Daniel Webster and Funk & Wagnalls is That quality of mind or spirit enabling one to meet jeopardy or difficulties/ opposition with firmness/fearlessness. The words that construct courage a relative term ar risk of exposure and opposition. The definitions of those words be what determine if a person or an act is considered to be heedless, courageous, or cowardice. Those labels change from society to society because people possess varying ideas as to what is danger and opposition means. For example, there are many types of people who encounter danger regularly like police, firefighters, cultural tribes, religious groups, teachers, advocates, doctors and nurses, criminals, and everyday people. Contrasting the contrast in the type of danger encountered by each group shows what makes courage different. The difference between the danger for the police and the danger for the criminals is that one is done without a valid reason. The danger for the criminals is created by themselves and consequently even though they encounter danger it is not courageous. It on the other hand is either foolhardy or cowardice. Actions like killing sprees or random slashing are considered foolhardy because the persons answerable are taking unnecessary risk. These actions can also be considered to be cowardice because the people responsible are generally either unwilling to caseful the consequences for their actions or unwilling to face the underlying reasons for their bursts of violence. In my mind and most other westernized cultured people minds, I am correct because criminal acts are not generally accepted nor rewarded in our society. However, in the eyes of a criminal his/her acts are courageous and are accepted and rewarded with some exceptions such as rape. When we look at actions of some cultural tribes we generally judge their actions towards certain opposition as foolhardy. Actions like capture styles or tribal initiations are judged to foolhardy because they are things that we as western civilized people do not do. We judge others ways of doing things and we completely thin out the fact that they are customs that sport existed for many years and they are necessary for each cultures survival.Free Definition Essay - The Meaning of Courage Expository Definition EssaysThe Meaning of Courage In life there are many terms that are relative to individual cultures. That means that the definition is different depending on the cultures location and its persons believe. The definition for one such term, courage, as defined by both Daniel Webster and Funk & Wagnalls is That quality of mind or spirit enabling one to meet danger or difficulties/ opposition with firmness/fearlessness. The words that make courage a relative term are danger and opposition. The definitions of those words are what determine if a person or an act is considered to be foolhardy, courageous, or cowardice. Those labels change from society to society because people possess varying ideas as to what is danger and opposition means. For example, there are many types of people who encounter danger regularly like police, firefighters, cultural tribes, religious groups, teachers, advocates, doctors and nurses, criminals, and everyday people. Contrasting the difference in the type of danger encountered by each group shows what makes courage different. The difference between the danger for the police and the danger for the criminals is that one is done without a valid reason. The danger for the criminals is created by themselves and therefore even though they encounter danger it is not courageous. It on the other hand is either foo lhardy or cowardice. Actions like killing sprees or random slashing are considered foolhardy because the persons responsible are taking unnecessary risk. These actions can also be considered to be cowardice because the people responsible are generally either unwilling to face the consequences for their actions or unwilling to face the underlying reasons for their bursts of violence. In my mind and most other westernized cultured people minds, I am correct because criminal acts are not generally accepted nor rewarded in our society. However, in the eyes of a criminal his/her acts are courageous and are accepted and rewarded with some exceptions such as rape. When we look at actions of some cultural tribes we generally judge their actions towards certain opposition as foolhardy. Actions like hunting styles or tribal initiations are judged to foolhardy because they are things that we as western civilized people do not do. We judge others ways of doing things and we complete ly ignore the fact that they are customs that have existed for many years and they are necessary for each cultures survival.